Expand All

Representative Matters

  • Represented the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey in an Article 78 proceeding in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, wherein petitioner’s challenge to the award of over $950 million in public works contracts was successfully defeated at the hearing and confirmed on appeal.
  • Lead counsel to New Jersey’s leading natural-gas distributor in the negotiation and drafting of a comprehensive $220 million EPC agreement for a major upgrade to its gas-processing and storage facility. The engagement includes structuring detailed engineering, procurement, construction, commissioning and performance-guarantee obligations, negotiating risk allocation for geotechnical and subsurface uncertainties, integrating complex milestone-payment, testing and liquidated-damages frameworks, and ensuring full alignment between technical specifications and commercial terms.
  • Lead counsel to an international power-infrastructure manufacturer in connection with more than $30 million in pending claims arising out of an EPC agreement involving a high-voltage underground transmission-cable relocation project, including disputes over unforeseen subsurface conditions, conduit and cable installation requirements, and owner-directed scope changes. The engagement includes prosecuting significant change-order entitlements and defending against defect allegations.
  • Represented a national insurance and surety provider in a complex dual investigation by the United States and New Jersey Attorneys General arising from a qui tam action asserting wide-ranging violations of the federal and state False Claims Acts, federal banking and financial-institution enforcement statutes, and New Jersey’s unclaimed-property laws. The matter involved overlapping federal and state investigative frameworks, extensive document and compliance analysis, and coordination with multiple enforcement agencies, and was successfully resolved prior to government intervention in the action.
  • Represented an international clean-energy developer that designs, manufactures and installs stationary hydrogen-fuel-cell systems in a trust-fund misappropriation action in the Supreme Court of the State of New York under Article 3-A of the New York Lien Law, involving alleged diversion of statutory trust assets on a major clean-energy project in New York City. The matter resulted in a multi-million-dollar settlement payment to the client and the client’s retention of fuel-cell units under the governing contracts.

In the News

Practice Members

Practices